<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 650 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439076</link>
    <description>The HC granted bail to the applicant, a woman, under the proviso to Section 45(1) PMLA, exempting her from the twin conditions for bail due to her gender. The court found no substantial evidence of flight risk, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, noting her willingness to renounce Dominican Republic citizenship and her limited involvement in the alleged money laundering activities. Bail conditions included surrendering her passport, not leaving the country, and refraining from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The court clarified that these findings were solely for the bail decision and not the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 650 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439076</link>
      <description>The HC granted bail to the applicant, a woman, under the proviso to Section 45(1) PMLA, exempting her from the twin conditions for bail due to her gender. The court found no substantial evidence of flight risk, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, noting her willingness to renounce Dominican Republic citizenship and her limited involvement in the alleged money laundering activities. Bail conditions included surrendering her passport, not leaving the country, and refraining from tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The court clarified that these findings were solely for the bail decision and not the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>