<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1261 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308327</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision to allow the writ petition. It emphasized the mandatory nature of considering objections before final assessment orders under Section 292(B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found the Assessing Officer had not addressed the objections raised by the assessee in a timely manner, rushing the proceedings to meet the deadline. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1261 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308327</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Single Judge&#039;s decision to allow the writ petition. It emphasized the mandatory nature of considering objections before final assessment orders under Section 292(B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found the Assessing Officer had not addressed the objections raised by the assessee in a timely manner, rushing the proceedings to meet the deadline. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>