<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 767 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308316</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeals after the appellant could not confirm whether High Powered Committee clearance had been obtained and identical appeals had already been dismissed. The order therefore ended the proceedings without examining the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 18:22:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 767 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308316</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeals after the appellant could not confirm whether High Powered Committee clearance had been obtained and identical appeals had already been dismissed. The order therefore ended the proceedings without examining the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>