<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Officials Charged; Finance Minister Approves Action u/r 14 of 1965 Rules, Aligns with Supreme Court Judgment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70356</link>
    <description>Charges against Income Tax Officer (ITO) and Assistant Director of Income Tax (Investigation) - independent approval of the Disciplinary Authority - The decisions of the Finance Minister approving the issuance of memorandum under Rule 14 of the Rules of 1965 were with a clear application of mind. So, in that sense the approvals were in conformity with the judgment of the Supreme Court - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:49:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Officials Charged; Finance Minister Approves Action u/r 14 of 1965 Rules, Aligns with Supreme Court Judgment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70356</link>
      <description>Charges against Income Tax Officer (ITO) and Assistant Director of Income Tax (Investigation) - independent approval of the Disciplinary Authority - The decisions of the Finance Minister approving the issuance of memorandum under Rule 14 of the Rules of 1965 were with a clear application of mind. So, in that sense the approvals were in conformity with the judgment of the Supreme Court - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:49:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>