<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 64 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Rectification Application under section 254(2) primarily due to the absence of any identifiable mistake on record and the Revenue&#039;s failure to raise relevant grounds during the proceedings. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to procedural requirements and presenting valid grounds for challenging decisions. Consequently, the Reference was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 64 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Rectification Application under section 254(2) primarily due to the absence of any identifiable mistake on record and the Revenue&#039;s failure to raise relevant grounds during the proceedings. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to procedural requirements and presenting valid grounds for challenging decisions. Consequently, the Reference was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>