<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 635 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439061</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging service tax assessment against an advocate. The court directed GST Commissioner to issue clear guidelines preventing harassment of practicing advocates through incorrect tax notices. The petitioner was exempted from service tax under the specified notification, and the tax demand of Rs. 332,651 was effectively nullified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 635 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439061</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging service tax assessment against an advocate. The court directed GST Commissioner to issue clear guidelines preventing harassment of practicing advocates through incorrect tax notices. The petitioner was exempted from service tax under the specified notification, and the tax demand of Rs. 332,651 was effectively nullified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>