<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 601 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439027</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty imposed on flat rolled aluminium products was held inapplicable to aluminium-based copper clad laminates, because the imported goods were found not to be covered by the notification as asserted by the Department. The record noted that the laminates were not manufactured in India, and that factual position remained uncontroverted. In the absence of a factual foundation to extend the notification to the imported product, the departmental challenge failed and the duty demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 601 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439027</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty imposed on flat rolled aluminium products was held inapplicable to aluminium-based copper clad laminates, because the imported goods were found not to be covered by the notification as asserted by the Department. The record noted that the laminates were not manufactured in India, and that factual position remained uncontroverted. In the absence of a factual foundation to extend the notification to the imported product, the departmental challenge failed and the duty demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>