<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 594 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439020</link>
    <description>Fresh, reinvestigation or de novo investigation is an exceptional power reserved for rare cases of unfair, tainted or mala fide inquiry; a blanket direction to wipe out the earlier investigation and restart ab initio was held unsustainable and was set aside. Money-laundering proceedings could be initiated on the basis of scheduled predicate offences and alleged proceeds of crime without first identifying a segregated property, so the challenge to the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s summons and proceedings failed. Limited inspection of records before the Special Court, followed by a proper copy application, was permitted. Refusal to extend time for further investigation did not nullify the earlier direction, and the contempt petitions and request for a Special Investigation Team were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 19:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 594 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439020</link>
      <description>Fresh, reinvestigation or de novo investigation is an exceptional power reserved for rare cases of unfair, tainted or mala fide inquiry; a blanket direction to wipe out the earlier investigation and restart ab initio was held unsustainable and was set aside. Money-laundering proceedings could be initiated on the basis of scheduled predicate offences and alleged proceeds of crime without first identifying a segregated property, so the challenge to the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s summons and proceedings failed. Limited inspection of records before the Special Court, followed by a proper copy application, was permitted. Refusal to extend time for further investigation did not nullify the earlier direction, and the contempt petitions and request for a Special Investigation Team were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>