<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 592 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439018</link>
    <description>The appellants in both appeals were found not liable to pay service tax under Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service (MRSAS). The Tribunal determined that the essence of the contracts was for work execution, not manpower supply, as payments were based on tonnage or unit basis, not per person basis. Therefore, the demands under MRSAS were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 08:01:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 592 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439018</link>
      <description>The appellants in both appeals were found not liable to pay service tax under Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service (MRSAS). The Tribunal determined that the essence of the contracts was for work execution, not manpower supply, as payments were based on tonnage or unit basis, not per person basis. Therefore, the demands under MRSAS were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>