<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1540 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308310</link>
    <description>The HC quashed a show cause notice dated 31.03.2022 issued by the State Tax Officer under the GST Act, relying on precedent from Aggarwal Dyeing and Printing Works v. State of Gujarat. The court allowed the writ application filed under Article 226, making the rule absolute. With the quashing of the notice, the applicant&#039;s GST registration was automatically restored. The court&#039;s decision emphasized proper procedural compliance in GST registration matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1540 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308310</link>
      <description>The HC quashed a show cause notice dated 31.03.2022 issued by the State Tax Officer under the GST Act, relying on precedent from Aggarwal Dyeing and Printing Works v. State of Gujarat. The court allowed the writ application filed under Article 226, making the rule absolute. With the quashing of the notice, the applicant&#039;s GST registration was automatically restored. The court&#039;s decision emphasized proper procedural compliance in GST registration matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>