<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 109 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33017</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ applications, vacated interim orders, and upheld the transfer of files for coordinated investigation from Kolkata to New Delhi. The court found the transfer justified due to interlacing and interconnection of funds and business activities within the Sahara group, complying with statutory requirements. The petitioner&#039;s objections were deemed meritless, and respondent No. 1 was considered justified in passing the transfer order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 109 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33017</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ applications, vacated interim orders, and upheld the transfer of files for coordinated investigation from Kolkata to New Delhi. The court found the transfer justified due to interlacing and interconnection of funds and business activities within the Sahara group, complying with statutory requirements. The petitioner&#039;s objections were deemed meritless, and respondent No. 1 was considered justified in passing the transfer order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>