https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308295 In a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, the High Court can interfere with concurrent findings of fact only after first formulating a substantial question of law; without that jurisdictional foundation, it cannot decide the appeal on merits. The SC found that the High Court had interfered without identifying any such question and therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the second appeal in that form. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted to the High Court for fresh disposal after hearing both sides on the question of law. en-us Tue, 01 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:05:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308295 In a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, the High Court can interfere with concurrent findings of fact only after first formulating a substantial question of law; without that jurisdictional foundation, it cannot decide the appeal on merits. The SC found that the High Court had interfered without identifying any such question and therefore lacked jurisdiction to entertain the second appeal in that form. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remitted to the High Court for fresh disposal after hearing both sides on the question of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308295