<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 108 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33013</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal by the Revenue, setting aside the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The issues regarding interest charged under section 234B of the Act and the interpretation of the Explanation below section 140A(1) were decided in favor of the Revenue. The judgment clarified the correct application of statutory provisions and the limitation period for rectifying orders under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 108 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33013</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal by the Revenue, setting aside the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The issues regarding interest charged under section 234B of the Act and the interpretation of the Explanation below section 140A(1) were decided in favor of the Revenue. The judgment clarified the correct application of statutory provisions and the limitation period for rectifying orders under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>