<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 194 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33012</link>
    <description>The High Court of GAUHATI upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal regarding the computation of the written down value of depreciable assets used in a tea business. The Court ruled that only 40 percent of the depreciation actually allowed at the prescribed rate should be deducted for determining the written down value. The appeals were dismissed in favor of the respondent, providing a detailed analysis of relevant provisions and precedents in reaching this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 194 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33012</link>
      <description>The High Court of GAUHATI upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal regarding the computation of the written down value of depreciable assets used in a tea business. The Court ruled that only 40 percent of the depreciation actually allowed at the prescribed rate should be deducted for determining the written down value. The appeals were dismissed in favor of the respondent, providing a detailed analysis of relevant provisions and precedents in reaching this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>