<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 568 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438994</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed all the appellant&#039;s appeals, highlighting errors in the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders regarding additions made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT emphasized the lack of incriminating evidence, improper consideration of facts, and erroneous assumptions, ruling in favor of the appellant and deleting the contested additions related to income from a partnership firm, commission income, unexplained cash, and unexplained jewelry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 568 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438994</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed all the appellant&#039;s appeals, highlighting errors in the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders regarding additions made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT emphasized the lack of incriminating evidence, improper consideration of facts, and erroneous assumptions, ruling in favor of the appellant and deleting the contested additions related to income from a partnership firm, commission income, unexplained cash, and unexplained jewelry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>