<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 543 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to the incorrect formula for reversal of Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) of CCR 2004, citing that the formula should only consider common Cenvat credit. The penalty imposed for short-payment of service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 543 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to the incorrect formula for reversal of Cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) of CCR 2004, citing that the formula should only consider common Cenvat credit. The penalty imposed for short-payment of service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>