<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 538 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438964</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the discount offered to distributors is a legitimate trade discount and not includable in the assessable value for excise duty. The expenses on installation and after-sale services during the warranty period, being post-manufacturing activities, are also not includable. Consequently, the demand for excise duty and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order-in-original was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 21:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 538 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438964</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the discount offered to distributors is a legitimate trade discount and not includable in the assessable value for excise duty. The expenses on installation and after-sale services during the warranty period, being post-manufacturing activities, are also not includable. Consequently, the demand for excise duty and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order-in-original was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>