https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308287 The appeal was allowed, reversing the acquittal and convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the evidence supported the issuance of the cheque in 2005, contradicting the respondent's claims. The dishonor of the cheque for insufficient funds was established, maintaining confidence in bank transactions. The respondent was convicted and fined Rs.3,00,000 to be paid to the appellant. en-us Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:48:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308287 The appeal was allowed, reversing the acquittal and convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the evidence supported the issuance of the cheque in 2005, contradicting the respondent's claims. The dishonor of the cheque for insufficient funds was established, maintaining confidence in bank transactions. The respondent was convicted and fined Rs.3,00,000 to be paid to the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308287