<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33000</link>
    <description>Classification of Dant Manjan Lal turned on the tariff heading terms, Chapter Notes and common parlance, because Chapter 30 contained no statutory definition of Ayurvedic medicine in sub-heading 3003.31. The product&#039;s composition, character and everyday use showed it was understood as a tooth powder for dental hygiene, and Chapter Note 1(d) to Chapter 30 excluded preparations falling under Chapter 33 even if therapeutic properties were claimed. Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 33 covered toilet preparations, so the specific tooth powder entry in Chapter 33 prevailed over the more general medicament description. The earlier classification ruling remained relevant because no material change in the product or its use was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33000</link>
      <description>Classification of Dant Manjan Lal turned on the tariff heading terms, Chapter Notes and common parlance, because Chapter 30 contained no statutory definition of Ayurvedic medicine in sub-heading 3003.31. The product&#039;s composition, character and everyday use showed it was understood as a tooth powder for dental hygiene, and Chapter Note 1(d) to Chapter 30 excluded preparations falling under Chapter 33 even if therapeutic properties were claimed. Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 33 covered toilet preparations, so the specific tooth powder entry in Chapter 33 prevailed over the more general medicament description. The earlier classification ruling remained relevant because no material change in the product or its use was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>