<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 521 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assumption of jurisdiction in reopening the assessment under Section 147 was invalid as statutory conditions were not met. The Tribunal also quashed the assessment order dated 10.03.2022 due to procedural irregularities. The disallowance of Rs. 25 lakhs under Section 37(1) was deemed unjustified, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The reopening of the assessment was found to be invalid, and the assessment order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 521 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assumption of jurisdiction in reopening the assessment under Section 147 was invalid as statutory conditions were not met. The Tribunal also quashed the assessment order dated 10.03.2022 due to procedural irregularities. The disallowance of Rs. 25 lakhs under Section 37(1) was deemed unjustified, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The reopening of the assessment was found to be invalid, and the assessment order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>