<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 96 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32996</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the amount withdrawn from the Investment Deposit Account should be taxed in the hands of the partners, not the dissolved partnership firm. The Court agreed that the second assessment under Section 147 was impermissible due to lack of valid reasons and the income already being taxed in an earlier assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 96 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32996</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the amount withdrawn from the Investment Deposit Account should be taxed in the hands of the partners, not the dissolved partnership firm. The Court agreed that the second assessment under Section 147 was impermissible due to lack of valid reasons and the income already being taxed in an earlier assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>