https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438916 A notice of enquiry under Section 34A was challenged on the basis that a prior supersession order should first have been recalled and that every society member ought to have received a separate hearing. The Court noted that the earlier supersession order had already been set aside and the matter reconsidered, and that the Government Order dated 01.03.2023 was passed after hearing the then office bearers, who included the incumbent President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer, along with some committee members. In these circumstances, the proceedings did not require individual hearing to every member of the Society. The impugned notice of enquiry was therefore set aside and the writ petition was partly allowed. en-us Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438916 A notice of enquiry under Section 34A was challenged on the basis that a prior supersession order should first have been recalled and that every society member ought to have received a separate hearing. The Court noted that the earlier supersession order had already been set aside and the matter reconsidered, and that the Government Order dated 01.03.2023 was passed after hearing the then office bearers, who included the incumbent President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer, along with some committee members. In these circumstances, the proceedings did not require individual hearing to every member of the Society. The impugned notice of enquiry was therefore set aside and the writ petition was partly allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438916