<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2146 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308269</link>
    <description>Functional comparability in transfer pricing depends on similarity of activities, reliable segmental results, accounting period consistency, and whether a company is engaged in software development services rather than software products or diversified operations. On that basis, a company with a different financial year was to be included after margin verification, the IT services segment of a multi-segment company was to be used, and software product companies with unreliable comparability were excluded, requiring recomputation of the arm&#039;s length margin. Outsourcing expenditure incurred for software development, where subcontracted work formed part of the final software supplied, was treated as operating cost because it was integral to the tested service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2146 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308269</link>
      <description>Functional comparability in transfer pricing depends on similarity of activities, reliable segmental results, accounting period consistency, and whether a company is engaged in software development services rather than software products or diversified operations. On that basis, a company with a different financial year was to be included after margin verification, the IT services segment of a multi-segment company was to be used, and software product companies with unreliable comparability were excluded, requiring recomputation of the arm&#039;s length margin. Outsourcing expenditure incurred for software development, where subcontracted work formed part of the final software supplied, was treated as operating cost because it was integral to the tested service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>