https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308281 HC addressed a tax dispute challenging CGST Rule 96(10) and IGST Act Section 16 as unconstitutional. Petitioner sought mandamus to invalidate these provisions and declaration of entitlement to pay integrated tax on exported goods. Court issued notice, directed no coercive recovery against petitioner, and permitted direct service. Interim relief granted pending further hearing scheduled for 24.11.2022. en-us Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308281 HC addressed a tax dispute challenging CGST Rule 96(10) and IGST Act Section 16 as unconstitutional. Petitioner sought mandamus to invalidate these provisions and declaration of entitlement to pay integrated tax on exported goods. Court issued notice, directed no coercive recovery against petitioner, and permitted direct service. Interim relief granted pending further hearing scheduled for 24.11.2022. Case-Laws GST Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308281