<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 465 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438891</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claim for mistakenly paid service tax under GTA service was rejected due to overlap with a previously confirmed demand period. Failure to establish any portion of the amount not covered by the earlier order led to the dismissal of the appeal and denial of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 465 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438891</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s refund claim for mistakenly paid service tax under GTA service was rejected due to overlap with a previously confirmed demand period. Failure to establish any portion of the amount not covered by the earlier order led to the dismissal of the appeal and denial of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>