https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32982 The Court modified the CIT (A) order in a case involving a trust challenging the payment directive for A.Y. 2005-06 and A.Y. 2006-07. The trust faced allegations of siphoning donations and undisclosed income additions. The Court required the petitioner to provide a bank guarantee of Rs. 1.50 crores within four weeks for the pending appeals, emphasizing the need to address the disputed donations during the appeal process. The CIT (A) was instructed to handle the appeals fairly, with the rule made absolute and no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32982 The Court modified the CIT (A) order in a case involving a trust challenging the payment directive for A.Y. 2005-06 and A.Y. 2006-07. The trust faced allegations of siphoning donations and undisclosed income additions. The Court required the petitioner to provide a bank guarantee of Rs. 1.50 crores within four weeks for the pending appeals, emphasizing the need to address the disputed donations during the appeal process. The CIT (A) was instructed to handle the appeals fairly, with the rule made absolute and no costs awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32982