<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Misreporting Penalty u/s 270A Overturned Due to Inadequate Justification by Assessing Officer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70258</link>
    <description>Penalty levied u/s 270A - misreporting of income - Since AO failed to bring the addition/disallowance he made in quantum assessment, under the ken of (a) to (f) of the sub-section(9) of section 270A of the Act, the penalty levied for misreporting @ 200% cannot be sustained because it is trite law that penalty provisions have to be strictly interpreted. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 11:44:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 11:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Misreporting Penalty u/s 270A Overturned Due to Inadequate Justification by Assessing Officer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70258</link>
      <description>Penalty levied u/s 270A - misreporting of income - Since AO failed to bring the addition/disallowance he made in quantum assessment, under the ken of (a) to (f) of the sub-section(9) of section 270A of the Act, the penalty levied for misreporting @ 200% cannot be sustained because it is trite law that penalty provisions have to be strictly interpreted. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 11:44:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>