<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court refuses to entertain writ if alternate remedy available</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11482</link>
    <description>The High Court refused the writ because an effective alternate remedy existed; the department had issued notices, the petitioner had replied, inquiry concluded on material produced by the petitioner, and sufficient opportunity consistent with principles of natural justice had been afforded, so the petitioner was directed to challenge the impugned orders by way of statutory appeal before the competent authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:51:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:51:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court refuses to entertain writ if alternate remedy available</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11482</link>
      <description>The High Court refused the writ because an effective alternate remedy existed; the department had issued notices, the petitioner had replied, inquiry concluded on material produced by the petitioner, and sufficient opportunity consistent with principles of natural justice had been afforded, so the petitioner was directed to challenge the impugned orders by way of statutory appeal before the competent authority.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Value Added Tax - VAT and CST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:51:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>