https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438872 HC addressed a dispute involving a manufacturer's IGST refund claim. Despite allegations of fake invoices, the court directed respondents to decide the refund application within 60 days, emphasizing statutory timelines under Section 54 of CGST Act. The judgment balanced investigative concerns with procedural requirements for prompt refund processing, mandating a time-bound resolution of the pending claim. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438872 HC addressed a dispute involving a manufacturer's IGST refund claim. Despite allegations of fake invoices, the court directed respondents to decide the refund application within 60 days, emphasizing statutory timelines under Section 54 of CGST Act. The judgment balanced investigative concerns with procedural requirements for prompt refund processing, mandating a time-bound resolution of the pending claim. Case-Laws GST Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438872