<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 445 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438871</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was declined where preliminary material indicated bogus e-way bills were generated without actual movement or delivery of goods. Vehicle owners and drivers denied transporting any goods, and the Court treated the record as prima facie showing no real transaction matching the e-way bills. On that basis, the Court found no ground to exercise discretionary pre-arrest bail relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 445 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438871</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was declined where preliminary material indicated bogus e-way bills were generated without actual movement or delivery of goods. Vehicle owners and drivers denied transporting any goods, and the Court treated the record as prima facie showing no real transaction matching the e-way bills. On that basis, the Court found no ground to exercise discretionary pre-arrest bail relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>