<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 414 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438840</link>
    <description>The appellant was not held liable to pay service tax under &#039;Renting of Immovable Property Services&#039; for amounts received from GRT. The Tribunal determined that the profit-sharing agreement between the appellant and GRT did not constitute a rental agreement but rather a sharing of business income, following precedents indicating such agreements fall outside the taxable service category. The Tribunal set aside the service tax demands, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 08:54:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 414 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438840</link>
      <description>The appellant was not held liable to pay service tax under &#039;Renting of Immovable Property Services&#039; for amounts received from GRT. The Tribunal determined that the profit-sharing agreement between the appellant and GRT did not constitute a rental agreement but rather a sharing of business income, following precedents indicating such agreements fall outside the taxable service category. The Tribunal set aside the service tax demands, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>