<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1375 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308248</link>
    <description>Pending appointments to the Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act justified interim protection for the petitioners. The Bombay High Court directed that status quo be maintained in both matters and restrained further coercive steps against the petitioners, while granting liberty to apply after appointments are made. The operative effect was temporary preservation of the existing position until the tribunal vacancies are filled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 21:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1375 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308248</link>
      <description>Pending appointments to the Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act justified interim protection for the petitioners. The Bombay High Court directed that status quo be maintained in both matters and restrained further coercive steps against the petitioners, while granting liberty to apply after appointments are made. The operative effect was temporary preservation of the existing position until the tribunal vacancies are filled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>