https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308250 The Court addressed the non-functionality of the Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (P.M.L.A.) due to the absence of a Chairperson. It directed a stay on coercive measures against the Petitioner's properties until the Appellate Authority reviews the stay Application, ensuring due process. The Court granted a one-week grace period post an adverse ruling for further legal actions. The judgment refrained from delving into the merits of the Petition, emphasizing fairness. The Writ petition was disposed of with a directive for compliance with the Court's order. en-us Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2023 21:06:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308250 The Court addressed the non-functionality of the Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (P.M.L.A.) due to the absence of a Chairperson. It directed a stay on coercive measures against the Petitioner's properties until the Appellate Authority reviews the stay Application, ensuring due process. The Court granted a one-week grace period post an adverse ruling for further legal actions. The judgment refrained from delving into the merits of the Petition, emphasizing fairness. The Writ petition was disposed of with a directive for compliance with the Court's order. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308250