<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438828</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the impugned orders and demand notices, directing the Respondent to cancel the incorrect PAN and reassess the Partnership Firm under the correct PAN for the relevant assessment years. Both parties were faulted for not rectifying the PAN issue earlier. The Court found in favor of the Firm, staying the demand notices and mandating a reassessment under the correct PAN, without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438828</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the impugned orders and demand notices, directing the Respondent to cancel the incorrect PAN and reassess the Partnership Firm under the correct PAN for the relevant assessment years. Both parties were faulted for not rectifying the PAN issue earlier. The Court found in favor of the Firm, staying the demand notices and mandating a reassessment under the correct PAN, without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>