<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 400 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, ruling it invalid. The Tribunal found that the PCIT unjustifiably expanded the scope of limited scrutiny and incorrectly classified high sea sales as speculative transactions. The AO was not required to investigate beyond the issues selected for limited scrutiny, and the PCIT&#039;s actions were outside the permissible scope. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 400 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, ruling it invalid. The Tribunal found that the PCIT unjustifiably expanded the scope of limited scrutiny and incorrectly classified high sea sales as speculative transactions. The AO was not required to investigate beyond the issues selected for limited scrutiny, and the PCIT&#039;s actions were outside the permissible scope. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>