<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 390 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438816</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and directing the assessing officer to delete the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjustified as it was based on an addition made on an estimate basis without clear proof of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:56:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 390 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438816</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and directing the assessing officer to delete the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjustified as it was based on an addition made on an estimate basis without clear proof of concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>