https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438800 Where the Adjudicating Authority dismisses an application without a merits-based determination and the applicant has not been fully heard on the substantive controversy, appellate interference by remand is warranted to secure fair adjudication. The NCLAT set aside the impugned order because the dispute had not been independently examined on merits and the appellant was entitled to an opportunity to present the substantive objections. The matter was restored for fresh consideration by the Adjudicating Authority in accordance with law, with no opinion expressed on the merits of the controversy. en-us Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:54:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438800 Where the Adjudicating Authority dismisses an application without a merits-based determination and the applicant has not been fully heard on the substantive controversy, appellate interference by remand is warranted to secure fair adjudication. The NCLAT set aside the impugned order because the dispute had not been independently examined on merits and the appellant was entitled to an opportunity to present the substantive objections. The matter was restored for fresh consideration by the Adjudicating Authority in accordance with law, with no opinion expressed on the merits of the controversy. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438800