<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 372 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438798</link>
    <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for a later show cause notice where the same subject-matter and similar facts had already been covered in an earlier notice and adjudication; facts already within the department&#039;s knowledge could not be treated as suppression for the later period. The demand also could not be sustained without accounting for the assessee&#039;s payments, reconciliation data, admissible abatements and reverse charge treatment, especially where the revenue did not displace the claimed tax adjustments or show the reconciliation to be incorrect. The impugned order was set aside on limitation and on merits, while liability for late filing fee remained unaffected to the extent already due.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 372 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438798</link>
      <description>Extended limitation could not be invoked for a later show cause notice where the same subject-matter and similar facts had already been covered in an earlier notice and adjudication; facts already within the department&#039;s knowledge could not be treated as suppression for the later period. The demand also could not be sustained without accounting for the assessee&#039;s payments, reconciliation data, admissible abatements and reverse charge treatment, especially where the revenue did not displace the claimed tax adjustments or show the reconciliation to be incorrect. The impugned order was set aside on limitation and on merits, while liability for late filing fee remained unaffected to the extent already due.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>