<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 371 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438797</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the demand of Rs. 1,87,93,063/- for service tax. They found that the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the nature of advances received was valid and that the adjustment of excess tax paid was permissible. The departmental appeal was dismissed due to lack of corroborative evidence for the service tax demand on the second installment. The tribunal&#039;s judgment was pronounced on 08.06.2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 371 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438797</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the demand of Rs. 1,87,93,063/- for service tax. They found that the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the nature of advances received was valid and that the adjustment of excess tax paid was permissible. The departmental appeal was dismissed due to lack of corroborative evidence for the service tax demand on the second installment. The tribunal&#039;s judgment was pronounced on 08.06.2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>