https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308237 The High Court admitted the appeal challenging the retrospective effect and clarificatory nature of a notification amending the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Court deemed questions related to this as substantial, scheduling a final hearing. However, questions regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner (Appeals) at Rajkot were dismissed. The Court also rejected requests for interim reliefs in Civil Applications, emphasizing the importance of substantial questions of law raised in the appeal. en-us Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2023 08:52:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308237 The High Court admitted the appeal challenging the retrospective effect and clarificatory nature of a notification amending the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Court deemed questions related to this as substantial, scheduling a final hearing. However, questions regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner (Appeals) at Rajkot were dismissed. The Court also rejected requests for interim reliefs in Civil Applications, emphasizing the importance of substantial questions of law raised in the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308237