https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308229 An application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC should ordinarily be considered together with the pending appeal where its determination is necessary for proper adjudication. The appellate court could not finally decide the appeal without first dealing with the request for additional evidence, so the order rejecting that application was set aside. The matter was directed to be decided on merits in conjunction with the appeal within the stipulated time, without any finding on whether the additional evidence itself ought to be admitted. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jun 2023 17:57:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308229 An application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC should ordinarily be considered together with the pending appeal where its determination is necessary for proper adjudication. The appellate court could not finally decide the appeal without first dealing with the request for additional evidence, so the order rejecting that application was set aside. The matter was directed to be decided on merits in conjunction with the appeal within the stipulated time, without any finding on whether the additional evidence itself ought to be admitted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308229