<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 179 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32956</link>
    <description>Denial of a requested personal hearing at the adjudication stage violated the principles of natural justice, and the subsequent appellate consideration could not cure that defect. The adjudication was decided only on the written reply and record despite the specific hearing request, so both the adjudication and appellate orders were unsustainable and were set aside. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 179 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32956</link>
      <description>Denial of a requested personal hearing at the adjudication stage violated the principles of natural justice, and the subsequent appellate consideration could not cure that defect. The adjudication was decided only on the written reply and record despite the specific hearing request, so both the adjudication and appellate orders were unsustainable and were set aside. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>