<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438774</link>
    <description>In transfer pricing, the most appropriate method depends on the transaction&#039;s nature, data reliability, comparability and adjustment accuracy, so an assessee is not bound by the method first selected in the study report if another method better satisfies those statutory tests. For a bundled acquisition of sports broadcasting rights through novation and sub-licence, a strict comparable uncontrolled price comparison was found unreliable because the available price data reflected the controlled contractual structure and changing market conditions. The broader other method was therefore the better benchmark, and an adjustment based only on alleged defects in the valuation report could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438774</link>
      <description>In transfer pricing, the most appropriate method depends on the transaction&#039;s nature, data reliability, comparability and adjustment accuracy, so an assessee is not bound by the method first selected in the study report if another method better satisfies those statutory tests. For a bundled acquisition of sports broadcasting rights through novation and sub-licence, a strict comparable uncontrolled price comparison was found unreliable because the available price data reflected the controlled contractual structure and changing market conditions. The broader other method was therefore the better benchmark, and an adjustment based only on alleged defects in the valuation report could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>