<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 338 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438764</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the ITAT, with the transfer pricing adjustment made by the TPO being deleted. The disallowance under section 40(a)(i) proposed by the CIT(A) was rejected. The additional ground challenging the jurisdiction of the Additional Commissioner was not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 338 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438764</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the ITAT, with the transfer pricing adjustment made by the TPO being deleted. The disallowance under section 40(a)(i) proposed by the CIT(A) was rejected. The additional ground challenging the jurisdiction of the Additional Commissioner was not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>