<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 215 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32950</link>
    <description>On a prima facie view, the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s claim to exemption as a commission agent under the relevant notification for the disputed period, treating the later explanation to the term as clarificatory. It held that the appellant had shown sufficient grounds for interim protection in relation to its business auxiliary service activity. As a result, waiver of dues was granted and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 215 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32950</link>
      <description>On a prima facie view, the Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s claim to exemption as a commission agent under the relevant notification for the disputed period, treating the later explanation to the term as clarificatory. It held that the appellant had shown sufficient grounds for interim protection in relation to its business auxiliary service activity. As a result, waiver of dues was granted and recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>