<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 294 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant timely filed within the statutory limitation period. The Respondent failed to prove the order was served on the same day it was dated, as the appellant&#039;s representative confirmed receipt on 18.06.2019. The case was remanded for the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider the merits of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:07:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 294 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant timely filed within the statutory limitation period. The Respondent failed to prove the order was served on the same day it was dated, as the appellant&#039;s representative confirmed receipt on 18.06.2019. The case was remanded for the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider the merits of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>