<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1379 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308224</link>
    <description>Section 197 CrPC protection applies only if the is a public servant removable only with Government sanction and the alleged act has a direct nexus with official duty. On the facts, the appellant&#039;s status on deputation and the degree of State control over the federation required evidence, and the question whether the post was protected was left open. Allegations of cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery were not, by their nature, acts done in discharge of official duty, though sanction could still be examined at later stages if the evidence so warranted. No interference was called for at this stage, and the sanction issue was left to be decided on the material during trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 21:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1379 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308224</link>
      <description>Section 197 CrPC protection applies only if the is a public servant removable only with Government sanction and the alleged act has a direct nexus with official duty. On the facts, the appellant&#039;s status on deputation and the degree of State control over the federation required evidence, and the question whether the post was protected was left open. Allegations of cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery were not, by their nature, acts done in discharge of official duty, though sanction could still be examined at later stages if the evidence so warranted. No interference was called for at this stage, and the sanction issue was left to be decided on the material during trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>