<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (4) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308209</link>
    <description>In an ancient impartible estate, a junior member has no present proprietary interest, only a contingent chance of succeeding by survivorship. On that basis, a relinquishment or renunciation deed cannot vest title in the eldest son, because renunciation under Hindu law can enlarge only an existing legal interest and cannot create title where none exists. The doctrine of surrender was also held inapplicable, as it is confined to a limited owner capable of accelerating reversion, not to an impartible estate holder in the manner claimed. The document&#039;s consideration and maintenance clauses further showed it was not a true surrender.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:28:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (4) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308209</link>
      <description>In an ancient impartible estate, a junior member has no present proprietary interest, only a contingent chance of succeeding by survivorship. On that basis, a relinquishment or renunciation deed cannot vest title in the eldest son, because renunciation under Hindu law can enlarge only an existing legal interest and cannot create title where none exists. The doctrine of surrender was also held inapplicable, as it is confined to a limited owner capable of accelerating reversion, not to an impartible estate holder in the manner claimed. The document&#039;s consideration and maintenance clauses further showed it was not a true surrender.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>