<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 268 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438694</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the disallowance of Rs. 8,65,57,909 for failure to deduct tax at source was unsustainable. The Court clarified that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source for the reimbursement, overturning the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow the amount under section 40(a)(i). The Delhi High Court&#039;s initial ruling was upheld, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 08:51:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 268 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438694</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the disallowance of Rs. 8,65,57,909 for failure to deduct tax at source was unsustainable. The Court clarified that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source for the reimbursement, overturning the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow the amount under section 40(a)(i). The Delhi High Court&#039;s initial ruling was upheld, and the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>