<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 212 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32939</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai partly allowed the waiver of pre-deposit and stay application by requiring deposit of the penalty amount under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, while granting waiver and stay for the remaining penalties on compliance with that condition. The operative effect was a conditional stay: only the specified penalty component had to be deposited, and relief from recovery was extended to the balance subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 212 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32939</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai partly allowed the waiver of pre-deposit and stay application by requiring deposit of the penalty amount under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, while granting waiver and stay for the remaining penalties on compliance with that condition. The operative effect was a conditional stay: only the specified penalty component had to be deposited, and relief from recovery was extended to the balance subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>